Metaphors we live by in Brazil: anthropophagic notes on classic and contemporary approaches to metaphor in the Brazilian scientific-academic context  / Metáforas da Vida Cotidiana no Brasil: notas antropofágicas sobre abordagens clássicas e contemporâneas da metáfora no contexto acadêmico-científico brasileiro

Maíra Avelar; Alan Cienki

doi:10.17851/2237-2083.28.2.667-688

Metaphors we live by in Brazil: anthropophagic notes on classic and contemporary approaches to metaphor in the Brazilian scientific-academic context / Metáforas da Vida Cotidiana no Brasil: notas antropofágicas sobre abordagens clássicas e contemporâneas da metáfora no contexto acadêmico-científico brasileiro

Maíra Avelar, Alan Cienki

Abstract

Full Text:

PDF

References

ANDRADE, O. Manifesto Antropofágico. In: TELES, G. M. (org.). Vanguarda européia e modernismo brasileiro: apresentação e crítica dos principais manifestos vanguardistas. 3. ed. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1928.

ANDRADE, O. Cannibalist Manifesto. Translated by Leslie Bary. Latin American Literary Review, New York, v. 19, n. 38, p. 38-47, 1991. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20119601. Date of access: Apr. 24, 2020.

AVELAR, M.; FERRARI, L.; SWEETSER, E. (org.). Metáforas Multimodais. Signo, Santa Cruz do Sul, v. 44, n. 79, 2019. Available at: https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/issue/view/553. Date of access: Apr. 4, 2020.

BRESSEM, J.; LADEWIG, S. H.; MÜLLER, C. A Linguistic Perspective on the Notation of Form Features in Gestures. In: MÜLLER, C.; CIENKI, A.; FRICKE, E.; LADEWIG, S. H.; MCNEILL, D.; TEßENDORF, S. (org.). Body – Language – Communication. An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013. p. 1098-1124.

CAMERON, L. Metaphor in Educational Discourse. London: Continuum, 2003.

CAMERON, L. Patterns of Metaphor Use in Reconciliation Talk. Discourse & Society, Thousand Oaks, v. 18, n. 2, p. 197-222, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507073376

CAMERON, L. J. Metaphor and Reconciliation: The Discourse Dynamics of Empathy in Post-Conflict Conversations. New York: Routledge, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203837771

CAMERON, L. Comparing Responses to Violence and Uncertainty in Brazil and the UK: A Collaborative Project. Antares, Caxias do Sul, v. 4, p. 8-28. 2012.

CAMERON L.; DEIGNAN, A. Combining Large and Small Corpora to Investigate Tuning Devices Around Metaphor in Spoken Discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, Abingdon, v. 18, p. 149-160, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1803_02

CAMERON, L.; LOW, G. Figurative Variation in Episodes of Educational Talk and Text. European Journal of English Studies, Abingdon, v. 8, n. 3, p. 355-373, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1382557042000277430

CAMERON, L.; MASLEN, R. (org.). Metaphor Analysis: Research Practice in Applied Linguistics, Social Sciences and the Humanities. London: Equinox, 2010.

CAMERON, L.; PELOSI, A.; DE MORAES FELTES, H. P. Metaphorizing Violence in the UK and Brazil: A Contrastive Discourse Dynamics Study. Metaphor and Symbol, Abingdon, v. 29, p. 23-43, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2014.859048

CARNEIRO, M. Emergência de metáforas sistemáticas na fala direta de mulheres vítimas de violência doméstica: uma análise cognitivo-discursiva. 2014. 303f. Tese (Doutorado em Linguística) – Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística, Universidade Federal do Ceará, 2014.

CAVALCANTE, S.; FERREIRA, L. C.; GUALDA, R. Metáfora: diferentes perspectivas. Scripta, Belo Horizonte, v. 20, n. 40, p. 8-17, 2016. Available at: http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/scripta/article/view/13963. Date of access: Apr. 24, 2020.

CIENKI, A. Metaphoric Gestures and Some of Their Relations to Verbal Metaphoric Expressions. In: KOENIG, J.-P. (org.). Discourse and Cognition: Bridging the Gap. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information, 1998. p. 189-204.

CIENKI, A. Image Schemas and Gesture. In: HAMPE, B. (org.). From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2005. p. 35-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197532.5.421

CIENKI, A. Why Study Metaphor and Gesture? In: CIENKI, A.; MÜLLER, C. (org.). Metaphor and Gesture. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2008. p. 5-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.3

CIENKI, A. Conceptual metaphor theory in light of research on gesture with speech. Cognitive Semiotics, Berlim, v. 5, n. 1-2, p. 349-366, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem.2013.5.12.349

CIENKI, A. Analysing Metaphor in Gesture: A Set of Metaphor Identification Guidelines for Gesture (MIG-G). In: SEMINO, E.; DEMJÉN, Z. (org.). The Routledge Handbook of Metaphor and Language. London: Routledge, 2017. p. 131-147.

CIENKI, A. A Multimodal Perspective on MCA: Cues of (Possible) Metacommunicative Awareness. In: DI-BIASE DYSON, C.; EGG, M. (org.). Drawing Attention to Metaphor: Case Studies across Time Periods, Cultures and Modalities, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2020. p. 63-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.5.04cie

CIENKI, A.; MÜLLER, C. (org.). Metaphor and Gesture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.3

FORCEVILLE, C. Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising. London: Routledge, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203272305

FORCEVILLE, C. Non-Verbal and Multimodal Metaphor in a Cognitivist Framework: Agendas for Research. In: KRISTIANSEN, G.; ACHARD, M.; DIRVEN, R.; RUIZ DE MENDOZA IBÁÑEZ, F. (org.). Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2006. p. 379-402.

FORCEVILLE, C.; URIOS-APARISI, E. (org.). Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215366

GIACOMO, P. Contemporary Theory of Metaphor: An Analysis of Lakoffian Echoes in Brazil. 2010. 248f. Dissertação (Mestrado) – Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 2010.

GIBBS, R. W. Jr. The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

GIBBS, R. W. Jr. Embodiment and Cognitive Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805844

GIBBS, R. W. Jr. (org.). The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802

GRADY, J. E. Foundations of Meaning: Primary Metaphors and Primary Scenes. 1997. Dissertation (PhD) – University of California, Berkeley, 1997a.

GRADY, J. E. THEORIES ARE BUILDINGS revisited. Cognitive Linguistics, Amsterdam, v. 8, n. 4, p. 267-290, 1997b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1997.8.4.267

GRADY, J. E. Image Schemas and Perception: Refining a Definition. In: HAMPE, B. (org.). From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2005a. p. 35-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197532.1.35

GRADY, J. Primary Metaphors as Inputs to Conceptual Integration. Journal of Pragmatics, Amsterdam, v. 37, p. 1595-1614, 2005b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.03.012

JÄKEL, O. Kant, Blumenberg, Weinrich: Some Forgotten Contributions in the Cognitive Theory of Metaphor. In: GIBBS, R.W. Jr.; STEEN, G. J. (org.). Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1999. p. 9-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.175.02jak

JOHNSON, M. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001

JOHNSON, M. Moral Imagination: Implications of Cognitive Science for Ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226223230.001.0001

KÖVECSES, Z. Metaphors of Anger, Pride, and Love: A Lexical Approach to the Structure of Concepts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pb.vii.8

KÖVECSES, Z. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.

KÖVECSES, Z. Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture, and Body in Human Feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

KÖVECSES, Z. Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614408

KÖVECSES, Z. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.

KÖVECSES, Z. Where Metaphors Come From: Reconsidering Context in Metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.001.0001

KRESS, G. Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach for Contemporary Communication. London, New York: Routledge, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203970034

LAKOFF, G. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001

LAKOFF, G. The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. In: ORTONY, A. (org.). Metaphor and Thought. 2. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993. p. 202-251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013

LAKOFF, G. Moral Politics: What Conservatives Know that Liberals Don’t, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996. [2nd edition published as Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.]

LAKOFF, G.; JOHNSON, M. Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.

LAKOFF, G.; JOHNSON, M. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books, 1999.

LAKOFF, G.; JOHNSON, M. Metáforas da vida cotidiana. Trad. e coord. Maria Sophia Zanotto. São Paulo: Marcado de Letras, 2002.

LENZ, P. Semântica Cognitiva. In: FERRAREZI JUNIOR, C.; BASSO, R. (org.). Semântica, semânticas: uma introdução. São Paulo: Contexto, 2013. p. 31-55.

LIMA, P. L. C.; AVELAR, M. (org.). Metáfora e multimodalidade. Revista Linguagem em Foco, Fortaleza, v. 10, n. 2, 2018. Available at: https://revistas.uece.br/index.php/linguagememfoco/issue/view/104. Date of access: Apr. 23, 2020.

LIMA, P.; MACEDO A.; FARIAS, E. (org.) Essays on Metaphor in Language and Thought. D.E.L.T.A., São Paulo, v. 26, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-44502010000300002. Available at: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-44502010000300002&lng=en&tlng=en. Date of access: Apr. 24, 2020.

MCNEILL, D.; LEVY, E. Conceptual Representations in Language Activity and Gesture. In: JARVELLA, R. J.; KLEIN, W. (org.). Speech, Place, and Action. Chichester: Wiley & Sons, 1982. p. 271-295.

MOURA, H.; VIEIRA, J.; NARDI, I. (org.). Metáfora e contexto. Linguagem em (Dis)curso, Tubarão, v. 7, n. 3, 2007. Available at: http://linguagem.unisul.br/paginas/ensino/pos/linguagem/linguagem-em-discurso/0703/00.htm. Date of access: Apr. 24, 2020.

MÜLLER, C. Redebegleitende Gesten. Kulturgeschichte – Theorie – Sprachvergleich. Berlin: Berlin Verlag A. Spitz, 1998.

MÜLLER, C. Metaphors Dead and Alive, Sleeping and Waking: A Dynamic View. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226548265.001.0001

MÜLLER, C. What Gestures Reveal about the Nature of Metaphor. In: CIENKI, A.; MÜLLER, C. (org.). Metaphor and Gesture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2008b. p. 219-245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.3.12mul

MÜLLER, C.; KAPPELHOFF, H. (org.). Cinematic Metaphor: Experience–Affectivity–Temporality. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110580785

MÜLLER, C.; TAG, S. The Dynamics of Metaphor: Foregrounding and Activating Metaphoricity in Conversational Interaction. Cognitive Semiotics, Berlim, v. 10, p. 85-120, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3726/81610_85

PEIRCE, Charles Sanders. The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1930/1958.

PELOSI, A.C.; DE MORAES FELTES, H. P.; CAMERON, L. Urban Violence in Brazil and the Role of the Media. Metaphor and the Social World, Berlim, v. 4, p. 27-47, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.4.1.02pel

PINHEIRO, H. Uma análise do dêitico “aqui” em dados multimodais. 2017. 171f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Linguística) – Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, 2017.

PRAGGLEJAZ GROUP. MIP: A Method for Identifying Metaphorically Used Words in Discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, Abingdon, v. 22, p. 1-39, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms2201_1

PRAGGLEJAZ GROUP. PIM: Um método para identificar palavras usadas metaforicamente no discurso. Trad. Dalby Dienstbach Hubert. Cadernos de Tradução, Porto Alegre, n. 25, p. 77-120, 2009.

SARDINHA, T. B. Análise de metáfora em corpora. Ilha do Desterro, Florianópolis, v. 52, p. 167-201, 2007.

SARDINHA, T. B. Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, Belo Horizonte, v. 11, n. 2, p. 329-360, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-63982011000200004

SIQUEIRA, M.; GIBBS, R. Children’s Acquisition of Primary Metaphors: A Cross-Linguistic Study. In: SIQUEIRA, M.; GIBBS, R. Children Language Acquisition of Primary Metaphors. Organon, Porto Alegre, n. 43, p. 161-179, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22456/2238-8915.39590

SIQUEIRA, M.; MARQUES, D.; GIBBS, R. Metaphor-Related Figurative Language Comprehension in Clinical Populations: A Critical Review. Scripta, Belo Horizonte, v. 20, n. 40, p. 36-60, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5752/P.2358-3428.2016v20n40p36.

STEEN, G. From Linguistic to Conceptual Metaphor in Five Steps. In: GIBBS, R. W., Jr.; STEEN, G. J. (org.). Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1999a. p. 57-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.175.05ste

STEEN, G. Metaphor and Discourse: Towards a Linguistic Checklist for Metaphor Analysis. In: CAMERON, L.; LOW, G. (org.). Researching and Applying Metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999b. p. 81-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524704.008

STEEN, G. J.; DORST, A. G.; HERRMANN, J. B.; KAAL, A. A.; KRENNMAYR, T.; PASMA, T. A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.14

SWEETSER, E. Regular Metaphoricity in Gesture: Bodily-Based Models of Speech Interaction. In: CONGRÈS INTERNATIONAL DES LINGUISTES, 16e., 1997, Paris. Actes [...]. [S.l.]: Elsevier, 1998. CD-ROM.

VEREZA, S. Articulating the conceptual and the discursive dimensions of figurative language in argumentative texts. D.E.L.T.A., São Paulo, v. 26, p. 701-718, 2010. Available at: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/delta/v26nspe/v26nspe15.pdf. Date of access: Apr. 24, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-44502010000300015

VIEIRA, J. R.; VEREZA, S. C. (org.). Metaphor in Language and Thought: Contemporary Perspectives. Ilha do Desterro, Florianópolis, v. 53, 2007.

ZANOTTO, M.; NARDI, J.; VEREZA, S. Essays on Metaphor in Language and Thought. D.E.L.T.A., São Paulo, v. 22, p. 9-16, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-44502006000300002

ZANOTTO, M. S.; CAMERON, L.; CAVALCANTI, M. C. (ed.) Confronting Metaphor in Use: An Applied Linguistic Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.173

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.28.2.667-688