Working memory capacity and speech production in L2: evidences from a picture description task

Kyria Finardi, Gicele Vergine Vieira Prebianca

Abstract


This is an experimental study which aimed at investigating theralationsship between working memory capacity and measuresof L2 speech performance in a picture description task. The mainassumption underlying the present study was that L2 speaking isa complex cognitive task which is carried out within theconstraints of a limited-capacity system, namely, working memory.In this system, there are trade-off effects between the storage andprocessing functions of working memory just as in L2 speakingthere are trade-off effects among fluency, accuracy and complexitywhen L2 learners perform under processing pressure.

Keywords


Working memory capacity; L2 speech production

References


BADDELEY, A. D. Human Memory: theory and practice. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1990.

BADDELEY, A. D. Working memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.

BADDELEY, A. D., HITCH, G. Working Memory. In: BOWER, G. A. (Ed.) The psychology of learning and motivation: advances in research and theory. 1974. v. 8, p. 47-90.

BADDELEY, A.D.; LOGIE, R.H. The multiple-component model. In: MIYAKE, Akira; SHAH, Priti (Ed.). Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1999. p. 28-61.

BYGATE, M. Tasks in language teaching. Special issue of Language Teaching Research, v. 4, n. 3, 2000.

BYGATE, M. Speaking. In: CARTER, R.; NUNAN, D. (Ed.). The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. Chapter 2, p. 14-20.

CONWAY, A.R.A., ENGLE, R. Individual differences in working memory capacity: more evidence for a general capacity theory. Memory, v. 4, p. 577-590, 1996.

CONWAY, A.R.A.; KANE, M.J.; BUNTING, M.F.; HAMBRICK, D.Z.; WILHELM, O.; RANDALL, W.E. Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & review, March 1, 2005.

D’ELY, R. A focus on learners’ metacognitive processes: strategic planning, repetition and planning for repetition as catalysts of interlanguage development, 2004. Unpublished research paper. UFSC.

DANEMAN, M. Working Memory as a predictor of verbal fluency. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, v. 20, p. 445-464, 1991.

DANEMAN, M.; CARPENTER, P. Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Leaning and Verbal Behaviour, v. 19, p. 450-466, 1980.

DANEMAN, M., GREEN, E. Individual differences in comprehending and producing words in context. Journal of Memory and Language, v. 25, p. 1-18, 1986.

ENGLE, R. W.; ORANSKY, N. Multi-store versus dynamic model of temporary storage in memory. In: STERNBERG, R. J. (Ed.). The nature of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999. p. 515-555.

ENGLE, R.W.; CANTOR, J.; CARULLO, J.J. Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: A test of four hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, v. 18, n. 5, p. 972-992, 1992.

ENGLE, R.W.; KANE, M.J.; TUHOLSKI, S.W. Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and functions of the prefrontal cortex. In: MIYAKE, Akira; SHAH, Priti (Ed.). Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1999. p. 102-134.

FORTKAMP, M. B. M. Working Memory Capacity and Aspects of L2 Speech Production. Communication & Cognition, v. 32, p. 259-296, 1999.

FORTKAMP, M. B. M.. Working Memory Capacity and L2 speech production: an exploratory study. 2000. Tese (Doutorado) - UFSC, Florianópolis, 2000.

FOSTER, P.; SKEHAN, P. The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, v. 18, p. 299-323, 1996.

JUST, M.A.; CARPENTER, P. A. A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, v. 87, p. 329-354, 1980.

KANE, M. J.; ENGLE, R. W. Working memory capacity, proactive interference, and divided attention: limits on long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: learning, memory and cognition, v. 26, p. 333-358, 2000.

MIYAKE, A., SHAH, P. Toward unified theories of working memory: Emerging general consensus, unresolved theoretical issues, and future research directions. In: MIYAKE, Akira; SHAH, Priti (Ed.). Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1999. p. 442-482.

SKEHAN, P. A. Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.

TURNER, N., ENGLE, R. Is working memory capacity task-dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, v. 28, p. 127-154, 1989.

VERHOEVEN, J.; De PAUW; KLOOTS, H. Speech rate in a pluricentric language: a comparison between Dutch in Belgium and the Netherlands. Language and Speech, v. 47, p. 297-308, 2004.

WEISSHEIMER, J., FORTKAMP, M.B.M. The effects of practice and strategy use on L2 working memory capacity and fluency, 2004. Unpublished research paper. UFSC.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.14.1.231-260

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
';



Copyright (c)



e - ISSN 2237-2083 

License

Licensed through  Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional