Email this article 
Reexame da noção de hierarquia temática
Abstract
Full Text:
PDF (Português (Brasil))References
BRESNAN, J.; KANERVA J. Locative inversion in Chichewa: a case study of factorization in grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, v. 20, p. 1-35, 1989.
CANÇADO, M. Verbos psicológicos: a relevância dos papéis temáticos vistos sob a ótica de uma semântica representacional. 1995. Tese (Doutorado) - Unicamp-IEL, Campinas, 1995.
CARRIER-DUNCAN, J. Linking of thematic roles in derivational word-formation. Linguistic Inquiry, v. 16, p. 1-34, 1985.
CHOMSKY, N. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris, 1981.
CHOMSKY, N. The Minimalist program. Cambridge (Mass.): The MIT Press, 1995-b.
CHOMSKY, N. Konwledge of language. New York: Praeger, 1986-a.
CHOMSKY, N. Barriers. Cambridge (Mass.): The MIT Press, 1986-b.
DOWTY, D. Thematic proto-roles and argument structures. Language, v. 67, p. 547-619, 1991.
ELISEU, A. G. S. S. Verbos ergativos do português: descrição e análise. Lisboa: Faculdade de Letras, 1984. (Manuscrito).
FILLMORE, C. J. The case for case. In: Bach, E.; HARMS, R. (Ed.). Universals in linguistic theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968.
FOLEY, W. A.; VALIN, R. D. van. Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
GIORGI, A. Towards a theory of long distance anaphors: a GB approach. Linguistic Review, v. 3, p. 307-361, 1984.
GIVÓN, T. Syntax. A funcional-typological introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1984.
GRIMSHAW, J. Psych verbs and the structure of argument structure. 1987. (Manuscrito. Brandeis University).
GRIMSHAW, J. Argument structure. Cambridge (Mass.): The MIT Press, 1990.
HUDSON, R. Raising in syntax, semantics and cognition. In: ROCA, I. M. (Ed.). Thematic structure: its role in grammar. Bertin: Foris Pubtications, 1992. p. 175-198.
ILARI, R.; FRANCHI, C. “Piero è andato a farsi tagliare i capelli”: estratégias de detematização nas línguas românicas. In: I CONGRESSO INTERNACIONAL DA ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE LINGÜÍSTICA, 1994, Salvador. Anais ... 1994.
JACKENDOFF, R. Toward an expplanatory semantic representation. Linguistic Inquiry 7, p. 89-150, 1976.
JACKENDOFF, R. Semantics and cognition. Cambridge (Mass.): The MIT Press, 1983.
JACKENDOFF, R. Semantic structures. Cambridge (Mass.): The MIT Press, 1990.
JACKENDOFF, R. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge (Mass.): The MIT Press, 1972.
LEVIN, B.; RAPPAPORT-HOVAV, H. Unnacusatives. At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge (Mass.): The MIT Press, 1995.
LEVIN, B. Towards a lexical organization of English verbs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.
MARANTZ, A. P. On the nature of grammatical relations. Cambridge (Mass.): The MIT Press, 1984.
PIMENTA-BUENO, M. A proposal for a unified treatement of reflexive, reciprocal, intrinsic, and impersonal SE in Portuguese. In: LANTOLF, J.; FRANK, F. W.; GUITART, J. M. (Ed.). Colloquium on Spanish and Luso-Brasilian linguistics. Washington: Georgetown University Press, 1979. p. 92-124.
RAPPAPORT, M.; LEVIN, B. What to do with -roles. In: WILKINS, W. Thematic relations. New York: Academic Press, 1988. p. 7-36.
ROUVERET, A.; VERGNAUD, J-R. Specifying reference to the subject. Linguistic Inquiry, v. 11, 1, p. 97-202, 1980.
VERGNAUD, J-R. Dépendances et niveaux de représentation en syntaxe. 1982. Tese (Doutorado) - Université de Paris VII, Paris, 1982.
WHITAKER-FRANCHI, R. C. M. As construções ergativas: um estudo sintático e semântico. 1989. Dissertação (Mestrado) – Unicamp-IEL, 1989.
ZUBIZARRETA, M. L. The lexical enconding of scope relations among arguments. In: WEHRLI, E.; STOWETT, T. (Ed.). Syntax and the lexicon. New York: Academic Press, 1992. p. 211-258.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.11.2.125-153
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c)
e - ISSN 2237-2083
Licensed through Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional