Predicação
Abstract
Full Text:
PDF (Português (Brasil))References
ALI, M. Said. Grammática histórica da língua portuguesa. São Paulo: Melhoramentos, 1921.
APOSTEL, L. Epistémologie de la Linguistique. In: PIAGET, J. et al. (Ed.) Logique e connaissance scientifique. Paris: Gallimard, 1967.
BACH, E. On time, tense and aspect: an essay in english metaphysics. In: COLE, P. (Ed.). Radical pragmantics. New York: Academic Press, 1981. p. 62-81.
BELLETTI, A.; RIZZI, L. Psych verbs and theta-theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 68, p. 291-352, 1988.
BIERWISCH, M. On classifying semantic features. In: BIERWISCH, M.; HEIDOLPH, K. E. (Ed.). Progress in Linguistics. La Haye: Mouton, 1970. p. 27-50. [Reeditado e revisto In: STEINBERG; JACOBOVITS (Ed.). 1970, p. 410-435.]
BRAME, M. Conjectures and refutations in syntax and semantics. New York: Elsevier, 1976.
BRESNAN, J. A realistic transformational grammar. In: HALLE, M. et al. (Ed.). Linguistic theory and psychological reality. Cambridge (Mass.): The MIT Press, 1978.
CAMARA JR., J. M. Princípios de Lingüística Geral. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Livraria Acadêmica, 1954.
CANÇADO, M. Verbos psicológicos: a relevância dos papéis temáticos vistos sob a ótica de uma semântica representacional. 1995. Tese (Doutorado) - Unicamp-IEL, Campinas, 1995.
CARNAP, R. Meaning and necessity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956.
CHIERCHIA, G. Topics in syntax and semantics of infinitives and gerunds. 1984. Tese (Doutorado) – University of Massachussetts at Amherst. New York: Garland, 1984.
CHIERCHIA, G. Structured meanings. Thematic roles and control. In: CHIERCHIA, G.; PARTEE, B. H.; TURNER, R. (Ed.). Properties, types and meaning. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989. p. 131-166.
CHOMSKY, N. Remarks on nominalization. In: JACOBS, R.; ROSENBAUM, P. (Ed.). Readings in English transformational grammar. Waltham (Mass.): Ginn & Co., 1970.
CHOMSKY, N. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris, 1981.
CHOMSKY, N. Konwledge of language. New York: Praeger, 1986-a.
CHOMSKY, N. Barriers. Cambridge (Mass.): The MIT Press, 1986-b.
CHOMSKY, N. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge (Mass.): The MIT Press, 1965.
CRESSWELL, M. Logics and languages. London: Methuen, 1973.
CRESSWELL, M. Adverbial modification. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1985.
DAVIDSON, D. The logical form of action sentences. In: RESCHER, N. (Ed.). Logic of decision and action. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburg Press, 1967. [Reeditado In: DAVIDSON, 1980, p. 105-122].
DIAS, A. E. Silva. Syntaxe histórica portuguesa. 3. ed. Lisboa: Livraria Clássica Editora, 1954.
DOWTY, D. Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing, 1979.
DOWTY, D. Thematic proto-roles and argument structures. Language, v. 67, p. 547-619, 1991.
DOWTY, D. On the semantic content of the notion of thematic role. In: CHIERCHIA, G.; PARTEE, B. H.; TURNER, R. (Ed.). Properties, types and meaning. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989. p. 69-129.
EMMONDS, J. A unified theory of syntatic categories. Dordrecht: Foris, 1985.
FEYS, R. La technique de la logique combinatoire. Revue Philosophique de Louvain, v. 44, p. 74-103; p. 237-270, 1946.
FIENGO, R. Surface structure. The interface of autonomous components. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press, 1980.
FILLMORE, C. J. Subjects, speakers, and roles. In: DAVIDSON, D.; HARMAN, G. (Ed.) Semantics of natural language. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing, 1972. p. 1-25.
FILLMORE, C. J. “The case for case” reopened. In: COLE, P.; SADOCK, J. M. (Ed.). Grammatical relations. London: Academic Press, 1977. p. 59-81.
FILLMORE, C. J. The case for case. In: Bach, E.; HARMS, R. (Ed.). Universals in linguistic theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968.
FODOR, J. The language of thought. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1975.
FOLEY, W. A.; VALIN, R. D. van. Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
FRANCHI, C. Hipóteses para uma teoria funcional da linguagem. 1976. Tese (Doutorado) – IEL-UNICAMP, Campinas, 1976.
FRANCHI, C. Teoria generalizada dos papéis temáticos. 1997-a. (Manuscrito em versão preliminar).
FRANCHI, C. Predicação. 1997-b. (Manuscrito em versão preliminar).
GARDINER, A. H. The theory of speech and language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1932. [2. ed. Clarendon Press, 1951].
GEACH, P. T. Reference and generality. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1962.
GIORGI, A.; LONGOBARDI, G. The syntax of noun phrases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
GUNNARSON, K. -A. Predicative structures and projections of dependence. Linguistic Inquiry, v. 17, p. 13-48, 1986.
HALLIDAY, M. A. K. Notes on transitivity and theme in English. Journal of Linguistics, v. 3, p. 37-81, 199-244, e v. 4, p. 179-215, 1967/1968.
HALLIDAY, M. A. K. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold, 1985.
HASEGAWA, N. A lexical interpretive theory with enphasis on the role of subject. 1981. Tese (Doutorado) – University of Washington, 1981.
HIGGINBOTHAM, J. On Semantics. Linguistic Inquiry, v. 16, p. 547-593, 1985.
HJELMSLEV, L. Omkring Sprogteoriens Grundlæggelse. København: Akademisk Forlag, 1966. [Tradução francesa: Prolégomènes à une théorie du langage. Paris: Éditions de Minuit].
HUANG, C. -T. J. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. 1982. Tese (Doutorado) – MIT, 1982.
ILARI, R. Propriedades de sentenças e contextos discursivos. 1974. Tese (Doutorado) – Unicamp-IEL, Campinas, 1974.
ILARI, R.; FRANCHI, C. Perspectiva funcional da frase portuguesa. Campinas: Editora da Unicamp, 1992.
ILARI, R.; FRANCHI, C. Clitic component and “pragmatic” functions in Biellese. 1983. (Manuscrito).
JACKENDOFF, R. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge (Mass.): The MIT Press, 1972.
JACKENDOFF, R. Semantics and cognition. Cambridge (Mass.): The MIT Press, 1983.
JACKENDOFF, R. The status of thematic relations in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry, v. 18, p. 369-411, 1987.
JACKENDOFF, R. Semantic structures. Cambridge (Mass.): The MIT Press, 1990.
JESPERSEN, O. The philosophy of grammar. 1924. [Na trad. francesa: La philosophie de la grammaire. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit, 1971].
JO NAPOLI, D. Predication theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
KAMP, H.; REYTE, U. From discourse to logic. Dordrecht: Ktuwer Academic Pubtishers, 1993.
KATZ, J. Semantic theory. New York: Harper and Row, 1972.
KEMPSON, R. M. Presupposition and the delimitation of pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975.
KEYSER, S. J.; ROEPER, T. On the ergative and middle constructions in English. Linguistic Inquiry, v. 15, p. 381-416, 1984.
KOSTER, J.; MAY, R. On the constituency of infinitives. Language, v. 58, p. 116-143, 1982.
KUNO, S. Functional sentence perspective. Linguistic Inquiry, v. 3, p. 3, 1972.
LAKOFF, G. On generative semantics. In: STEINBERG, D. D.; JACOBOVITS, L. A. (Ed.). Semantics. An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971. p. 232-296.
LAKOFF, G. Linguistics and natural logic. In: DAVIDSON, D.; HARMAN, G. (Ed.) Semantics of natural language. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing, 1972. p. 545-665.
LAMBRECHT, K. Verb agreement in non-standard French. Amsterdam: John Benjamin, 1982.
LEVIN, B. Towards a lexical organization of English verbs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.
LEWIS, D. General semantics. In: DAVIDSON, D.; HARMAN, G. (Ed.) Semantics of natural language. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing, 1972. p. 169-218.
MARANTZ, A. P. On the nature of grammatical relations. Cambridge (Mass.): The MIT Press, 1984.
MCCAWLEY, J. Concerning the base component of a transformational grammar. Fondations of Language, v. 4, p. 243-269, 1968-a.
MCCAWLEY, J. The role of semantics in a grammar. In: BACH, E.; HARMS, R. (Ed.). Universals in linguistic theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968-b. p. 124-169.
MONTALBETTI, M. M. After binding. 1984. Tese (Doutorado) – MIT, 1984.
PUSTEJOVSKY, J. The generative lexicon. Cambridge (Mass.): The MIT Press, 1995.
QUINE, W. V. O. Word and object. Cambridge (Mass.): The MIT Press, 1960.
REICHENBACH, H. Elements of symbolic logic. New York: The Free Press, 1947.
ROTHSTEIN, S. The syntatic form of predication. 1983. Tese (Doutorado) – MIT, 1983.
SAITO, M. Some assimetries in Japanese and their theoretical implications. 1985. Tese. (Doutorado) – MIT, 1985.
STOWELL, T. Origins of phrase structure. 1981. Tese (Doutorado) – MIT, 1981.
STOWELL, T. Subjects across categories. The Linguistic Review, v. 2, p. 285-312, 1983.
STRAWSON, P. F. Grammar and Philosophy. In: DAVIDSON, D.; HARMAN, G. (Ed.) Semantics of natural language. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing, 1972. p. 455-472.
THOMSON, R.; STATNAKER, R. A semantic theory of adverbs. Linguistic Inquiry, v. 4, p. 195-220, 1973.
WEINREICH, U. Lexicografic definition in descriptive semantics. In: HOUSEHOLDER, F.; SAPORTA, S. (Ed.). Problems in lexicography. La Haye: Mouton, 1962. p. 25-43.
WILLIAMS, E. Thematic structure in sintax. Cambridge (Mass.): The MIT Press, 1995.
WILLIAMS, E. Predication. Linguistic Inquiry, v. II, p. 208-238, 1980.
WILLIAMS, E. Argument structure and morphology. The Linguistic Review, v. I, p. 81-114, 1981.
WILLIAMS, E. Againt small-clauses. Linguistic Inquiry, 14, p. 287-308, 1983.
WUNDERLICH, Dieter. How do prepositional phrases fit into compositional syntax and semantics. Linguistics, v. 29, p. 591-621, 1991.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.11.2.17-81
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c)
e - ISSN 2237-2083
Licensed through Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional